Interesting News

A Theory of “Powerless Language”

An excerpt from “Men and Women in Conversation: An Analysis of Gender Styles in Language” by SUSAN GITHENS Lafayette College May 1991

O’Barr and Atkins: In an article entitled “‘Women’s Language’ or ‘Powerless Language’?” William O’Barr and Bowman Atkins described the results of their 1980 courtroom study. They studied “language variation in a specific institutional context – the American trial courtroom — and sex-related differences” were the topic of this particular article (McConnell-Ginet, Borker, Furman, p. 93). During the process of witness examination they analyzed how-to books by successful trial lawyers and law professors who had included special sections on how to handle female witnesses. O’Barr and Atkins studied courtroom cases for 30 months, observing a broad spectrum of witnesses. They examined the witnesses for the ten basic speech differences between men and women that Robin Lakoff proposed. O’Barr and Atkins discovered that the differences that Lakoff and others supported are not necessarily the result of being a woman, but of being powerless. They used three men and three women to prove their point. The first man and woman both spoke with a high frequency of “women’s language” components. The woman was a 68-year old housewife, and the man drove an ambulance. In comparison to woman and man #3 — a doctor and a policeman, respectively, who both testified as expert witnesses — they show that the first pair of witnesses experience less power in their jobs and lives. O’Barr and Atkins found that pair #2 fell between pairs 1 and 3 in frequency of hedges and tag questions, etcetera, in their speech.

O’Barr and Atkins concluded from their study that the quoted speech patterns were “neither characteristic of all women nor limited only to women” (McConnell-Ginet, et al., p. 102). The women who used the lowest frequency of women’s language traits had an unusually high status (according to the researchers). They were well-educated professionals with middle class backgrounds. A corresponding pattern was noted among the men who spoke with a low frequency of women’s language traits. O’Barr and Atkins tried to emphasize that a powerful position “may derive from either social standing in the larger society and/or status accorded by the court” (McConnell-Ginet, et al., p. 103).



3 thoughts on “A Theory of “Powerless Language”

  1. I wonder whan will happen if a person having a low status will speak “powerful language”? Will their status go up immediately?

    If a non-native speaker, for example, demonstrates the accent peculiar for public school graduates will they be treated like one?

    If so, shouldn’t we teach powerful language only?

  2. According to the article speaking “Powerful language” depends on social standing. To my mind people who speak “Powerful language” are more confident and powerful. The researchers said that women who used the lowest frequency of women’s language traits were well-educated professionals. I think people who have a low status can’t speak “Powerful language” because they are less power in their jobs. I’m not sure that we can teach “Powerful language”. But we can study and work hard to succeed in our work and to deserve respect. Then we will speak “Powerful language”.
    I think a non-native speakers who demonstrate a good accent may be treated like public school graduates if they are confidend and behave like public school graduates.

  3. When you say we can’t teach it what exactly do you mean? Could you name a few features of the “powerful” and “powerless” language to convince us they can’t be taught in a classroom?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s